

An ongoing split is forming across US healthcare, a divide that health system leaders are driving overtly or by default.
On one side are the organizations building real-time reflexes into their operations. On the other are the organizations whose pace is still dictated by vendor-defined data access paths, delayed data, and workflows that are constrained by the vendor architecture.
This divide isn’t philosophical. It is operational. And it is widening fast. This will be the competitive divide for the next decade.
Markets don’t stall because of a single vendor. They stall when incumbents limit the freedom for customers to move faster, choose better, and innovate on top of their own data. As modernization accelerates, health systems are sorting into two identifiable groups:
These organizations are developing the ability to govern their own data access, sense operational signals as they occur, and route actions immediately. They are beginning to build reflex loops, which are lightweight, programmable logic that prevents revenue loss (fewer denials, reduced LOS), mitigates safety drift, reduces manual intervention, and stabilizes workflows before problems compound. They seek destiny control and predictable value creation.
These organizations lean toward independence in how they access and use their own data, and they treat delay as a form of waste rather than an unavoidable byproduct of enterprise IT.
These organizations face the same challenges as real-time health systems, but move at the speed of vendor-mediated access. They depend on (costly) sanctioned interfaces, roadmap timelines, batch extracts, and manual processes to identify operational issues. Limited tooling to say the least.
These organizations treat delays as an avoidable byproduct of enterprise IT and accumulating operational drag is their norm.
Four forces are driving the move to real-time health systems faster than the industry expected:
These forces have shifted the strategic question from “What technology do we need?” to “How fast can we recognize and act on our own operational signals?” as the foundation for automation and innovation capabilities.
Every service unit has its list, but they look remarkably similar across health systems.
While these issues rarely appear as technology failures, they often show up as operational realities. Every one of these problems is a real-time problem trapped in a legacy data access model. The cost of delay is not just inefficiency, but also lost margin, avoidable friction, patient harm, and workforce strain.
Organizations that operate in real time do not wait for dashboards to tell them what happened. They program their systems to notice and act on what matters in real-time:
Acting and adapting fast, which few systems do well today, is a strategic market differentiator and quickly becoming a survival imperative as this divide widens. This is the identity high-performing systems realize they must rise to.
The executive unlock is straightforward.
Health systems don’t need multi-year digital transformation programs to build real-time reflexes. They need clarity and sequence.
Every health system will be forced to modernize its reflexes. The question is timing.
Organizations that move now will define the performance frontier and expand markets. Those that wait to modernize will fall further behind.